Aruba vs South Korea: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Aruba
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.662 against 0.6278 in Aruba, a difference of 0.0342.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Korea ahead.
Aruba ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2271 | 0.6137 | 0.3866 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.5361 | 0.6474 | 0.1114 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.5573 | 0.6963 | 0.139 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0.6964 | 0.6902 | 0.0062 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.6278 | 0.662 | 0.0342 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Aruba or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0.662 against 0.6278 in Aruba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Aruba and South Korea?
- 0.0342, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Korea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and South Korea rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Aruba ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.