Azerbaijan vs Finland: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Azerbaijan
- Finland
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.226 against 0.211 in Finland, a difference of 0.015.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Finland ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 118th and Finland ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.2183 | 0.2183 | Finland |
| 1990s | 0.0848 | 0.2804 | 0.1956 | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.1512 | 0.3013 | 0.1501 | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.2303 | 0.2723 | 0.042 | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.226 | 0.211 | 0.015 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Azerbaijan or Finland?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.226 against 0.211 in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Azerbaijan and Finland?
- 0.015, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Finland?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Azerbaijan and Finland rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 118th and Finland ranks 120th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.