Azerbaijan vs Jamaica: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Azerbaijan
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.2477 against 0.226 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.0217.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jamaica ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 118th and Jamaica ranks 115th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1955 | 0.1955 | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 0.0848 | 0.1697 | 0.0849 | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 0.1512 | 0.1666 | 0.0154 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0.2303 | 0.2003 | 0.0301 | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.226 | 0.2477 | 0.0218 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Azerbaijan or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.2477 against 0.226 in Azerbaijan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Azerbaijan and Jamaica?
- 0.0217, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Jamaica?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Azerbaijan and Jamaica rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 118th and Jamaica ranks 115th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.