Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.2706 against 0.2519 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0187.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 113th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.023 | 0.028 | 0.0051 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0794 | 0.0677 | 0.0117 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.2291 | 0.1994 | 0.0297 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.2519 | 0.2706 | 0.0188 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.2706 against 0.2519 in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0187, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Belarus ranks 113th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.