Bolivia vs South Korea: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Bolivia
- South Korea
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.6878 against 0.662 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0258.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Korea ahead.
Bolivia ranks 23rd and South Korea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0466 | 0.6137 | 0.5671 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.0625 | 0.6474 | 0.585 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.1413 | 0.6963 | 0.555 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0.5203 | 0.6902 | 0.1699 | South Korea |
| 2020s | 0.6878 | 0.662 | 0.0258 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Bolivia or South Korea?
- Bolivia, at 0.6878 against 0.662 in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Bolivia and South Korea?
- 0.0258, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and South Korea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and South Korea rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Bolivia ranks 23rd and South Korea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.