Botswana vs Singapore: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Botswana
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.3189 against 0.3101 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0088.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 103rd and Singapore ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0935 | 0.2374 | 0.1439 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.1186 | 0.266 | 0.1474 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.1685 | 0.341 | 0.1725 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.2522 | 0.3638 | 0.1116 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.3101 | 0.3189 | 0.0088 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Botswana or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.3189 against 0.3101 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Botswana and Singapore?
- 0.0088, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Singapore?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Singapore rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Botswana ranks 103rd and Singapore ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.