Bulgaria vs Macau, China: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Bulgaria
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0.95 against 0.9055 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0445.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Macau, China ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.114 | 0.4303 | 0.3163 | Macau, China |
| 1990s | 0.5357 | 0.7097 | 0.174 | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 0.69 | 0.728 | 0.0379 | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0.9126 | 0.9252 | 0.0126 | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.9055 | 0.95 | 0.0445 | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Bulgaria or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 0.95 against 0.9055 in Bulgaria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Bulgaria and Macau, China?
- 0.0445, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Macau, China?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bulgaria and Macau, China rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Bulgaria ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.