Burundi vs Ethiopia: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Burundi
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.0426 against 0.0352 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0074.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Burundi ranks 170th and Ethiopia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0036 | 0.009 | 0.0054 | Ethiopia |
| 1990s | 0.0113 | 0.0083 | 0.003 | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0.019 | 0.011 | 0.008 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0.0396 | 0.0322 | 0.0074 | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.0426 | 0.0352 | 0.0074 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Burundi or Ethiopia?
- Burundi, at 0.0426 against 0.0352 in Ethiopia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Burundi and Ethiopia?
- 0.0074, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Ethiopia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Burundi and Ethiopia rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Burundi ranks 170th and Ethiopia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.