Congo vs Mozambique: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Congo
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.0886 against 0.0878 in Congo, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 149th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0079 | 0 | 0.0079 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.0076 | 0.0359 | 0.0283 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 0.0139 | 0.0384 | 0.0245 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.066 | 0.0853 | 0.0193 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0.0878 | 0.0886 | 0.0008 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Congo or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.0886 against 0.0878 in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Congo and Mozambique?
- 0.0008, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Congo ranks 149th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.