Denmark vs Venezuela: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Denmark
- Venezuela
How they compare
Venezuela currently reports 0.4012 against 0.3993 in Denmark, a difference of 0.0019.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 76th and Venezuela ranks 73rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Venezuela in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6043 | 0.2111 | 0.3931 | Denmark |
| 1990s | 0.7817 | 0.202 | 0.5797 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.8091 | 0.264 | 0.5451 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.5552 | 0.3918 | 0.1635 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.3993 | 0.4012 | 0.0019 | Venezuela |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Denmark or Venezuela?
- Venezuela, at 0.4012 against 0.3993 in Denmark as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Denmark and Venezuela?
- 0.0019, with Venezuela ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Venezuela?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and Venezuela rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Denmark ranks 76th and Venezuela ranks 73rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.