Eswatini vs Sweden: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Eswatini
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.2812 against 0.2529 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0283.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1196 | 0.3077 | 0.1881 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.1138 | 0.3134 | 0.1996 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.1199 | 0.4238 | 0.3039 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.2303 | 0.3865 | 0.1562 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.2529 | 0.2812 | 0.0283 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Eswatini or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.2812 against 0.2529 in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Eswatini and Sweden?
- 0.0283, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sweden?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Sweden rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Eswatini ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 109th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.