Ethiopia vs South Sudan: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Ethiopia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0.0352 against 0.0194 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0158.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.8 times South Sudan's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 173rd and South Sudan ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.009 | 0 | 0.009 | Ethiopia |
| 1990s | 0.0083 | 0 | 0.0083 | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.01 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.0322 | 0.0183 | 0.0139 | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 0.0352 | 0.0194 | 0.0158 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Ethiopia or South Sudan?
- Ethiopia, at 0.0352 against 0.0194 in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Ethiopia and South Sudan?
- 0.0158, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and South Sudan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Ethiopia and South Sudan rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Ethiopia ranks 173rd and South Sudan ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.