Gabon vs Norway: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Gabon
- Norway
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 0.1617 against 0.1539 in Norway, a difference of 0.0078.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Norway ahead.
Gabon ranks 131st and Norway ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0403 | 0.1479 | 0.1076 | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.052 | 0.1866 | 0.1346 | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.069 | 0.3099 | 0.2409 | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.1483 | 0.2784 | 0.1301 | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.1617 | 0.1539 | 0.0079 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Gabon or Norway?
- Gabon, at 0.1617 against 0.1539 in Norway as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Gabon and Norway?
- 0.0078, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Norway?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Gabon and Norway rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Gabon ranks 131st and Norway ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.