Gambia vs Lesotho: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Gambia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.1199 against 0.1045 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0154.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 144th of 183 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0558 | 0.0366 | 0.0192 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 0.0495 | 0.0405 | 0.009 | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.0629 | 0.041 | 0.0219 | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.117 | 0.0922 | 0.0248 | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.1199 | 0.1045 | 0.0154 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Gambia or Lesotho?
- Gambia, at 0.1199 against 0.1045 in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Gambia and Lesotho?
- 0.0154, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Lesotho?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Gambia and Lesotho rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Gambia ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 144th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.