Guinea-Bissau vs Rwanda: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Rwanda
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0735 against 0.0707 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0028.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Rwanda ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th and Rwanda ranks 157th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0048 | 0.0048 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.001 | 0.0043 | 0.0032 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.0084 | 0.0171 | 0.0087 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0492 | 0.0863 | 0.0371 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0735 | 0.0707 | 0.0029 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Guinea-Bissau or Rwanda?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0735 against 0.0707 in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?
- 0.0028, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th and Rwanda ranks 157th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.