Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.4615 against 0.4591 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0024.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Malta ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2995 | 0.2421 | 0.0574 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.3094 | 0.4881 | 0.1787 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.4268 | 0.6312 | 0.2044 | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.4739 | 0.643 | 0.1691 | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.4591 | 0.4615 | 0.0025 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.4615 against 0.4591 in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 0.0024, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Malta ranks 59th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.