Indonesia vs Tunisia: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Indonesia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.4017 against 0.4009 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Tunisia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0537 | 0.1333 | 0.0795 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.1012 | 0.1591 | 0.0578 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.1105 | 0.1897 | 0.0792 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.3682 | 0.3342 | 0.0339 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.4009 | 0.4017 | 0.0008 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Indonesia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.4017 against 0.4009 in Indonesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Indonesia and Tunisia?
- 0.0008, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Tunisia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Tunisia rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Indonesia ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.