Japan vs Seychelles: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Japan
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 0.8962 against 0.8824 in Japan, a difference of 0.0138.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Seychelles ahead.
Japan ranks 6th and Seychelles ranks 5th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.8304 | 0.6325 | 0.1979 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.859 | 0.5651 | 0.2939 | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.8779 | 0.6523 | 0.2255 | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.8829 | 0.7965 | 0.0864 | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.8824 | 0.8962 | 0.0138 | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Japan or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 0.8962 against 0.8824 in Japan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Japan and Seychelles?
- 0.0138, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Seychelles?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Japan and Seychelles rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Japan ranks 6th and Seychelles ranks 5th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.