Jordan vs Singapore: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Jordan
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.3189 against 0.2945 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0244.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.
Jordan ranks 104th and Singapore ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2799 | 0.2374 | 0.0425 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.2822 | 0.266 | 0.0161 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.2897 | 0.341 | 0.0513 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.2881 | 0.3638 | 0.0757 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.2945 | 0.3189 | 0.0244 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Jordan or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.3189 against 0.2945 in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Jordan and Singapore?
- 0.0244, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Singapore?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Singapore rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Jordan ranks 104th and Singapore ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.