Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4522 against 0.4491 in Namibia, a difference of 0.0031.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.0347 | 0.1394 | 0.1048 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.1356 | 0.195 | 0.0594 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.3568 | 0.4107 | 0.0538 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.4522 | 0.4491 | 0.0031 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4522 against 0.4491 in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0.0031, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.