Kiribati vs Nigeria: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Kiribati
- Nigeria
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.1284 against 0.1218 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0066.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nigeria ahead.
Kiribati ranks 138th and Nigeria ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.058 | 0.058 | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.0354 | 0.0511 | 0.0157 | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.114 | 0.0684 | 0.0456 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.1238 | 0.1259 | 0.002 | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.1284 | 0.1218 | 0.0066 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Kiribati or Nigeria?
- Kiribati, at 0.1284 against 0.1218 in Nigeria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Kiribati and Nigeria?
- 0.0066, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nigeria?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kiribati and Nigeria rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Kiribati ranks 138th and Nigeria ranks 140th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.