Kyrgyzstan vs Sri Lanka: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.2864 against 0.2706 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0158.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1094 | 0.1094 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.028 | 0.1061 | 0.0781 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0677 | 0.1535 | 0.0858 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.1994 | 0.2768 | 0.0774 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.2706 | 0.2864 | 0.0158 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Kyrgyzstan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.2864 against 0.2706 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0158, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.