Luxembourg vs Macau (China): Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Luxembourg
- Macau (China)
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.9755 against 0.95 in Macau (China), a difference of 0.0255.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Macau (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Macau (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.8693 | 0.4303 | 0.4391 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.9803 | 0.7097 | 0.2706 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.9656 | 0.728 | 0.2376 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.976 | 0.9252 | 0.0508 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.9755 | 0.95 | 0.0255 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Luxembourg or Macau (China)?
- Luxembourg, at 0.9755 against 0.95 in Macau (China) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Luxembourg and Macau (China)?
- 0.0255, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Macau (China)?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Luxembourg and Macau (China) rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Luxembourg ranks 1st and Macau (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.