Malaysia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Malaysia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.3494 against 0.3478 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0016.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.158 | 0 | 0.158 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.2691 | 0.0509 | 0.2182 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0.3011 | 0.1376 | 0.1635 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.3597 | 0.4095 | 0.0498 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 0.3478 | 0.3494 | 0.0017 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Malaysia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.3494 against 0.3478 in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0016, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Malaysia ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.