Nicaragua vs Paraguay: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Nicaragua
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.226 against 0.1855 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0405.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 122nd and Paraguay ranks 119th of 183 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0428 | 0.0606 | 0.0178 | Paraguay |
| 1990s | 0.0535 | 0.0938 | 0.0403 | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 0.0908 | 0.094 | 0.0032 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0.1651 | 0.2223 | 0.0572 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.1855 | 0.226 | 0.0405 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Nicaragua or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.226 against 0.1855 in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Nicaragua and Paraguay?
- 0.0405, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Nicaragua and Paraguay rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Nicaragua ranks 122nd and Paraguay ranks 119th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.