Advanced Markets vs Sweden: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Advanced Markets
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1 against 0.6694 in Advanced Markets, a difference of 0.3306.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times Advanced Markets's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sweden ahead.
Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 9 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Advanced Markets | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3557 | 0.5057 | 0.15 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.4885 | 0.5587 | 0.0702 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.5832 | 0.7635 | 0.1802 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.6308 | 0.9859 | 0.3551 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.6694 | 1 | 0.3306 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Advanced Markets or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1 against 0.6694 in Advanced Markets as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Advanced Markets and Sweden?
- 0.3306, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Advanced Markets and Sweden?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Advanced Markets and Sweden rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.