Angola vs Solomon Islands: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Angola
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.0392 against 0.0384 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Angola ranks 163rd and Solomon Islands ranks 164th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0311 | 0.0311 | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 0.1127 | 0.019 | 0.0936 | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.0485 | 0.0257 | 0.0227 | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.0562 | 0.0338 | 0.0224 | Angola |
| 2020s | 0.0392 | 0.0384 | 0.0009 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Angola or Solomon Islands?
- Angola, at 0.0392 against 0.0384 in Solomon Islands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0008, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Angola and Solomon Islands rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Angola ranks 163rd and Solomon Islands ranks 164th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.