Armenia vs Georgia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Armenia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.1853 against 0.1653 in Armenia, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Georgia ahead.
Armenia ranks 100th and Georgia ranks 97th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.0134 | 0.0084 | 0.005 | Armenia |
| 2000s | 0.0246 | 0.0484 | 0.0238 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0921 | 0.1122 | 0.0201 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.1653 | 0.1853 | 0.02 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Armenia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.1853 against 0.1653 in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Armenia and Georgia?
- 0.02, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Georgia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Georgia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Armenia ranks 100th and Georgia ranks 97th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.