Armenia vs Saudi Arabia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Armenia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.1763 against 0.1653 in Armenia, a difference of 0.011.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 100th and Saudi Arabia ranks 98th of 183 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0657 | 0.0657 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 0.0134 | 0.089 | 0.0756 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 0.0246 | 0.117 | 0.0924 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.0921 | 0.1346 | 0.0425 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 0.1653 | 0.1763 | 0.011 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Armenia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.1763 against 0.1653 in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Armenia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.011, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Saudi Arabia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Armenia ranks 100th and Saudi Arabia ranks 98th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.