Austria vs Thailand: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Austria
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.6387 against 0.6158 in Austria, a difference of 0.0229.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2495 | 0.1768 | 0.0727 | Austria |
| 1990s | 0.3845 | 0.3641 | 0.0204 | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.6422 | 0.3877 | 0.2545 | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.6152 | 0.5578 | 0.0574 | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.6158 | 0.6387 | 0.0229 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Austria or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.6387 against 0.6158 in Austria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Austria and Thailand?
- 0.0229, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Thailand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Thailand rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Austria ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 31st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.