Barbados vs Jamaica: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Barbados
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.7113 against 0.6779 in Barbados, a difference of 0.0334.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 26th and Jamaica ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3724 | 0.3096 | 0.0628 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 0.4828 | 0.319 | 0.1638 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.5945 | 0.2771 | 0.3175 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.6828 | 0.5012 | 0.1816 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0.6779 | 0.7113 | 0.0334 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Barbados or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.7113 against 0.6779 in Barbados as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Barbados and Jamaica?
- 0.0334, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Jamaica?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Barbados and Jamaica rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Barbados ranks 26th and Jamaica ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.