Bhutan vs Eswatini: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Bhutan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.1319 against 0.1202 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0117.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bhutan ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0048 | 0.0795 | 0.0746 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0154 | 0.0734 | 0.058 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0378 | 0.072 | 0.0342 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0989 | 0.115 | 0.0161 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.1319 | 0.1202 | 0.0117 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Bhutan or Eswatini?
- Bhutan, at 0.1319 against 0.1202 in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 0.0117, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bhutan and Eswatini rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Bhutan ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.