Bolivia vs Botswana: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Bolivia
- Botswana
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.4507 against 0.3981 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0526.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Botswana ahead.
Bolivia ranks 40th and Botswana ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0518 | 0.1669 | 0.115 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 0.1367 | 0.1942 | 0.0575 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.234 | 0.3194 | 0.0854 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.33 | 0.3883 | 0.0584 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.4507 | 0.3981 | 0.0526 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Bolivia or Botswana?
- Bolivia, at 0.4507 against 0.3981 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Bolivia and Botswana?
- 0.0526, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Botswana?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Botswana rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Bolivia ranks 40th and Botswana ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.