Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs China: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0.5 against 0.4507 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.0493.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 40th and China ranks 37th of 183 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0518 | 0.1474 | 0.0955 | China |
| 1990s | 0.1367 | 0.2506 | 0.1139 | China |
| 2000s | 0.234 | 0.3606 | 0.1266 | China |
| 2010s | 0.33 | 0.4222 | 0.0923 | China |
| 2020s | 0.4507 | 0.5 | 0.0493 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or China?
- China, at 0.5 against 0.4507 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and China?
- 0.0493, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and China?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and China rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 40th and China ranks 37th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.