Bolivia vs Colombia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Bolivia
- Colombia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.4507 against 0.4088 in Colombia, a difference of 0.0419.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Colombia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 40th and Colombia ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 4 and Colombia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0518 | 0.1256 | 0.0738 | Colombia |
| 1990s | 0.1367 | 0.1261 | 0.0106 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 0.234 | 0.1887 | 0.0453 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 0.33 | 0.3048 | 0.0252 | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 0.4507 | 0.4088 | 0.0419 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Bolivia or Colombia?
- Bolivia, at 0.4507 against 0.4088 in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Bolivia and Colombia?
- 0.0419, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Colombia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Colombia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Bolivia ranks 40th and Colombia ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.