Botswana vs El Salvador: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Botswana
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.4239 against 0.3981 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0258.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 43rd and El Salvador ranks 41st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1669 | 0.0851 | 0.0818 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 0.1942 | 0.108 | 0.0862 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.3194 | 0.2446 | 0.0748 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.3883 | 0.3313 | 0.0571 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.3981 | 0.4239 | 0.0258 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Botswana or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 0.4239 against 0.3981 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Botswana and El Salvador?
- 0.0258, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and El Salvador?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and El Salvador rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Botswana ranks 43rd and El Salvador ranks 41st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.