Burkina Faso vs Uganda: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Burkina Faso
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.1021 against 0.1006 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0015.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 125th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0467 | 0.0138 | 0.033 | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 0.0351 | 0.0271 | 0.008 | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.0447 | 0.0418 | 0.0029 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0.0689 | 0.0717 | 0.0028 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.1006 | 0.1021 | 0.0015 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Burkina Faso or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.1021 against 0.1006 in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Burkina Faso and Uganda?
- 0.0015, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Uganda?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Burkina Faso and Uganda rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Burkina Faso ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 125th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.