Burundi vs Cameroon: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Burundi
- Cameroon
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.0653 against 0.0607 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.0046.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cameroon ahead.
Burundi ranks 147th and Cameroon ranks 149th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Cameroon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0148 | 0.0766 | 0.0618 | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 0.033 | 0.0529 | 0.0199 | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 0.0548 | 0.0463 | 0.0085 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0.061 | 0.056 | 0.005 | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.0653 | 0.0607 | 0.0047 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Burundi or Cameroon?
- Burundi, at 0.0653 against 0.0607 in Cameroon as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Burundi and Cameroon?
- 0.0046, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cameroon?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Burundi and Cameroon rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Burundi ranks 147th and Cameroon ranks 149th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.