Chile vs Luxembourg: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Chile
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.7481 against 0.707 in Chile, a difference of 0.0411.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4806 | 0.527 | 0.0464 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.422 | 0.5693 | 0.1473 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.5508 | 0.5866 | 0.0358 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.6314 | 0.626 | 0.0054 | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.707 | 0.7481 | 0.0411 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Chile or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.7481 against 0.707 in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Chile and Luxembourg?
- 0.0411, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Luxembourg?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Luxembourg rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Chile ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.