China vs Portugal: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- China
- Portugal
How they compare
China currently reports 0.5 against 0.4535 in Portugal, a difference of 0.0465.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Portugal ahead.
China ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 39th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1474 | 0.4112 | 0.2639 | Portugal |
| 1990s | 0.2506 | 0.4986 | 0.248 | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0.3606 | 0.6183 | 0.2577 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0.4222 | 0.5326 | 0.1103 | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.4535 | 0.0464 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, China or Portugal?
- China, at 0.5 against 0.4535 in Portugal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between China and Portugal?
- 0.0465, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Portugal?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do China and Portugal rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- China ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 39th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.