Congo vs Mauritania: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Congo
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.0548 against 0.0513 in Congo, a difference of 0.0035.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritania ahead.
Congo ranks 156th and Mauritania ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0492 | 0.0311 | 0.0182 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.0217 | 0.0361 | 0.0144 | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.0266 | 0.0341 | 0.0076 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.0504 | 0.0388 | 0.0116 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0513 | 0.0548 | 0.0034 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Congo or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.0548 against 0.0513 in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Congo and Mauritania?
- 0.0035, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Congo ranks 156th and Mauritania ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.