Costa Rica vs Jordan: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Jordan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.3766 against 0.3619 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0147.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 46th and Jordan ranks 48th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2104 | 0.243 | 0.0327 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1393 | 0.2733 | 0.134 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.2078 | 0.3478 | 0.1399 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.2651 | 0.3424 | 0.0773 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.3766 | 0.3619 | 0.0147 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Costa Rica or Jordan?
- Costa Rica, at 0.3766 against 0.3619 in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 0.0147, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Jordan rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Costa Rica ranks 46th and Jordan ranks 48th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.