Costa Rica vs Mauritius: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.3893 against 0.3766 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0127.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 46th and Mauritius ranks 45th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2104 | 0.1586 | 0.0517 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.1393 | 0.2457 | 0.1064 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.2078 | 0.3184 | 0.1106 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.2651 | 0.3943 | 0.1293 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.3766 | 0.3893 | 0.0127 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Costa Rica or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.3893 against 0.3766 in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Costa Rica and Mauritius?
- 0.0127, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mauritius?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mauritius rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Costa Rica ranks 46th and Mauritius ranks 45th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.