Cote d'Ivoire vs Egypt: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Egypt
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0866 against 0.0844 in Egypt, a difference of 0.0022.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 132nd and Egypt ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1123 | 0.0856 | 0.0267 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 0.0785 | 0.0931 | 0.0145 | Egypt |
| 2000s | 0.0654 | 0.1295 | 0.0641 | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.0782 | 0.0877 | 0.0095 | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0.0866 | 0.0844 | 0.0022 | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Cote d'Ivoire or Egypt?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.0866 against 0.0844 in Egypt as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 0.0022, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 132nd and Egypt ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.