Croatia vs India: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Croatia
- India
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.3967 against 0.3761 in India, a difference of 0.0206.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was India ahead.
Croatia ranks 44th and India ranks 47th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and India in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1308 | 0.1308 | India |
| 1990s | 0.1252 | 0.1383 | 0.013 | India |
| 2000s | 0.2294 | 0.2655 | 0.0361 | India |
| 2010s | 0.3356 | 0.3164 | 0.0192 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.3967 | 0.3761 | 0.0206 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Croatia or India?
- Croatia, at 0.3967 against 0.3761 in India as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Croatia and India?
- 0.0206, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and India?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and India rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Croatia ranks 44th and India ranks 47th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.