Denmark vs Japan: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.9425 against 0.8922 in Japan, a difference of 0.0503.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Japan ahead.
Denmark ranks 7th and Japan ranks 8th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4843 | 0.5761 | 0.0918 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.66 | 0.6347 | 0.0252 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.8302 | 0.6189 | 0.2113 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.9254 | 0.7597 | 0.1657 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.9425 | 0.8922 | 0.0504 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Denmark or Japan?
- Denmark, at 0.9425 against 0.8922 in Japan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Denmark and Japan?
- 0.0503, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Denmark ranks 7th and Japan ranks 8th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.