Denmark vs South Africa: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Denmark
- South Africa
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.9425 against 0.8781 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0644.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Africa ahead.
Denmark ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4843 | 0.6288 | 0.1445 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 0.66 | 0.6576 | 0.0023 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.8302 | 0.7594 | 0.0708 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.9254 | 0.8592 | 0.0662 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.9425 | 0.8781 | 0.0644 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Denmark or South Africa?
- Denmark, at 0.9425 against 0.8781 in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Denmark and South Africa?
- 0.0644, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and South Africa?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and South Africa rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Denmark ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.