Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Eswatini
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.1202 against 0.1102 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.01.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0795 | 0.0434 | 0.0361 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0734 | 0.0455 | 0.0279 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.072 | 0.0831 | 0.0111 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.115 | 0.1102 | 0.0048 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.1202 | 0.1102 | 0.01 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
- Eswatini, at 0.1202 against 0.1102 in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 0.01, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Eswatini ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.