French Polynesia vs South Sudan: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- French Polynesia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0039 against 0 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0039.
Across all 41 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 179th of 183 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 | 0.0023 | 0.0023 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, French Polynesia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0039 against 0 in French Polynesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between French Polynesia and South Sudan?
- 0.0039, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and South Sudan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do French Polynesia and South Sudan rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- French Polynesia ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 179th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.