Georgia vs Kuwait: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Georgia
0.1853
in 2020
Kuwait
0.1857
in 2020
Georgia rank
97th
Kuwait rank
96th
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Georgia
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0.1857 against 0.1853 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0004.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1629 | 0.1629 | Kuwait |
| 1990s | 0.0084 | 0.0999 | 0.0915 | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 0.0484 | 0.1314 | 0.0831 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 0.1122 | 0.1686 | 0.0564 | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 0.1853 | 0.1857 | 0.0004 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Georgia or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 0.1857 against 0.1853 in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Georgia and Kuwait?
- 0.0004, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kuwait?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Kuwait rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Georgia ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.